Researchers at Stanford University School of Medicine warned that simply smoking marijuana was not a solution to Alzheimer’s.
Alzheimer's Reading Room
Endocannabinoids are part of the process that allows important signals in the brain to shine through while unwanted signals are shut out.
Blocking them results in the brain becoming too inhibited, leading to impaired learning and memory loss.
|Subscribe to the Alzheimer's Reading Room|
Blocking brain’s ‘internal marijuana’ may trigger early Alzheimer’s deficits, study shows
A-beta, a substance suspected as a prime culprit in Alzheimer’s disease, may start impairing learning and memory long before plaques form in the brain.
- A new study led by investigators at the Stanford University School of Medicine has implicated the blocking of endocannabinoids — signaling substances that are the brain’s internal versions of the psychoactive chemicals in marijuana and hashish — in the early pathology of Alzheimer’s disease.
- A substance called A-beta — strongly suspected to play a key role in Alzheimer’s because it’s the chief constituent of the hallmark clumps dotting the brains of people with Alzheimer’s — may, in the disease’s earliest stages, impair learning and memory by blocking the natural, beneficial action of endocannabinoids in the brain, the study demonstrates.
- The Stanford group is now trying to figure out the molecular details of how and where this interference occurs. Pinning down those details could pave the path to new drugs to stave off the defects in learning ability and memory that characterize Alzheimer’s.
- In the study, published in Neuron researchers analyzed A-beta’s effects on a brain structure known as the hippocampus.
- In all mammals, this midbrain structure serves as a combination GPS system and memory-filing assistant, along with other duties.
“The hippocampus tells us where we are in space at any given time,” said Daniel Madison, PhD, associate professor of molecular and cellular physiology and the study’s senior author. “It also processes new experiences so that our memories of them can be stored in other parts of the brain. It’s the filing secretary, not the filing cabinet.”Surprise finding
- Applying electrophysiological techniques to brain slices from rats, Madison and his associates examined a key hippocampal circuit, one of whose chief elements is a class of nerve cells called pyramidal cells.
- They wanted to see how the circuit’s different elements reacted to small amounts of A-beta, which is produced throughout the body but whose normal physiological functions have until now been ill-defined.
- A surprise finding by Madison’s group suggests that in small, physiologically normal concentrations, A-beta tamps down a signal-boosting process that under certain conditions increases the odds that pyramidal nerve cells will transmit information they’ve received to other nerve cells down the line.
- When incoming signals to the pyramidal tract build to high intensity, pyramidal cells adapt by becoming more inclined to fire than they normally are. This phenomenon, which neuroscientists call plasticity, is thought to underpin learning and memory.
- It ensures that volleys of high-intensity input — such as might accompany falling into a hole, burning one’s finger with a match, suddenly remembering where you buried the treasure or learning for the first time how to spell “cat” — are firmly stored in the brain’s memory vaults and more accessible to retrieval.
- Pyramidal nerve cells constantly receive random beeps and burps from upstream nerve cells — effectively, noise in a highly complex, electrochemical signaling system.
- This calls for some quality control. Pyramidal cells are encouraged to ignore mere noise by another set of “wet blanket” nerve cells called interneurons.
- Like the proverbial spouse reading a newspaper at the kitchen table, interneurons continuously discourage pyramidal cells’ transmission of impulses to downstream nerve cells by steadily secreting an inhibitory substance — the molecular equivalent of yawning, eye-rolling and oft-muttered suggestions that this or that chatter is really not worth repeating to the world at large, so why not just shut up.
- But when the news is particularly significant, pyramidal cells squirt out their own “no, this is important, you shut up!” chemical — endocannabinoids — which bind to specialized receptors on the hippocampal interneurons, temporarily suppressing them and allowing impulses to continue coursing along the pyramidal cells to their follow-on peers.
- A-beta is known to impair pyramidal-cell plasticity. But Madison’s research team showed for the first time how it does so. Small clusters consisting of just a few A-beta molecules render the interneuron’s endocannabinoid receptors powerless, leaving inhibition intact even in the face of important news and thus squashing plasticity.
- While small A-beta clusters have been known for a decade to be toxic to nerve cells, this toxicity requires relatively long-term exposure, said Madison. The endocannabinoid-nullifying effect the new study revealed is much more transient.
- A possible physiological role for A-beta in the normal, healthy brain, he said, is that of supplying that organ’s sophisticated circuits with yet another, beneficial layer of discretion in processing information.
- Madison thinks this normal, everyday A-beta mechanism run wild may represent an entry point to the progressive and destructive stages of Alzheimer’s disease.
Rather, it interferes with something that binding ordinarily generates. (By analogy, turning the key in your car’s ignition switch won’t do much good if your battery is dead.)
"Exposure to marijuana over minutes or hours is different: more like enhancing everything indiscriminately, so you lose the filtering effect."Madison said it would be wildly off the mark to assume that, just because A-beta interferes with a valuable neurophysiological process mediated by endocannabinoids, smoking pot would be a great way to counter or prevent A-beta’s nefarious effects on memory and learning ability.
- Smoking or ingesting marijuana results in long-acting inhibition of interneurons by the herb’s active chemical, tetrahydrocannabinol.
- That is vastly different from short-acting endocannabinoid bursts precisely timed to occur only when a signal is truly worthy of attention.
“Endocannabinoids in the brain are very transient and act only when important inputs come in,” said Madison, who is also a member of the interdisciplinary Stanford Bio-X institute. “Exposure to marijuana over minutes or hours is different: more like enhancing everything indiscriminately, so you lose the filtering effect. It’s like listening to five radio stations at once.”
- Flooding the brain with external cannabinoids induces tolerance — it may reduce the number of endocannabinoid receptors on interneurons, impeding endocannabinoids’ ability to do their crucial job of opening the gates of learning and memory.
Related Articles in the Alzheimer's Reading Room
- What is Alzheimer's Disease?
- What is the Difference Between Alzheimer’s and Dementia
- Test Your Memory for Alzheimer's (5 Best Tests)
- 10 Things a Person Living with Dementia Would Tell You If They Could
- 3 Ways to Get an Alzheimer's Patient to Eat More Food
- Communicating in Alzheimer's World
- 10 Symptoms of Early Stage Alzheimer's Disease
- The Seven Stages of Alzheimer's
The study’s lead author was postdoctoral scholar Adrienne Orr, PhD. Other co-authors were postdoctoral scholars Jesse Hanson, PhD (now at Genentech) and Dong Li, PhD; and former undergraduate Adam Klotz, now a student at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business. The study was funded by the National Institute for Mental Health (grant MH065541), the Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation and Elan Pharmaceuticals.
Information about Stanford’s Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, which also supported this work, is available at http://mcp.stanford.edu.